Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- RB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oklahoma State (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Oklahoma State 2015 recruiting class reveals a diverse range of outcomes from its recruits, reflecting a mix of success and underperformance. With a total of 22 recruits and a blue chip percentage of 15, expectations varied across the class. The S2S rerank from 33 to 52 indicates a notable shift in the perceived value of this recruiting class compared to initial expectations.
Among the standout performers, Chris Carson emerged as an NFL Starter, showcasing the potential for high-ranked recruits to excel beyond their initial rankings. This indicates that, despite a lower blue chip percentage, the program capitalized on developing talent effectively. Conversely, several recruits, such as John Kolar, Antwan Hadley, and Todd Mays, did not meet the expectations set by their rankings, contributing to the class's overall decline in perceived value.
Overall, the Oklahoma State 2015 recruiting class met expectations to a degree but also exhibited significant underperformance among several ranked recruits. The S2S rerank decreased, suggesting that while some players developed well, others did not fulfill their potential. This class serves as a reminder of the variability inherent in recruiting outcomes, where early projections do not always align with player performance.
Takeaway: The 2015 class had notable hits but was marred by several underperforming recruits, leading to a mixed evaluation of overall success.