Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- S2
- WR2
- DE1
- LB1
- QB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oklahoma State (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2014 recruiting class for Oklahoma State showcased a mix of outcomes that reflect both successful development and unmet potential. With a total of 29 recruits and a blue-chip percentage of 30, the expectations were set for a competitive class that could contribute positively to the program. However, the S2S rerank moving from 26 to 32 indicates a slight decline in the perceived value of the recruits based on their performances.
Several players, particularly James Washington and Jordan Brailford, emerged as significant contributors at the NFL level, indicating that the program succeeded in developing talent that exceeded their initial rankings. Conversely, the presence of two notable misses, particularly with Devon Thomas and Tyreek Hill, points to a mixed outcome for higher-ranked recruits, suggesting that not all expectations were met.
Overall, the 2014 recruiting class for Oklahoma State met expectations, particularly with the emergence of key players such as Washington and Brailford, who not only contributed at the college level but also made it to the NFL. However, the class's overall standing was tempered by the performance of several mid-ranked players who did not fulfill expectations, leading to a slight drop in the class rank. The takeaway from this evaluation is that while the class produced notable talent, it also illustrates the unpredictable nature of recruiting outcomes for both high and mid-tier prospects.