Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- LB1
- S1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Georgia Tech (2010).
2010 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Georgia Tech 2010 recruiting class, ranked 30th overall, demonstrated a performance that was consistent with its original expectations. The S2S rerank remained unchanged at 30, indicating that the class met the anticipated outcomes based on the recruits' rankings. With a blue chip percentage of 37, the class included a mix of highly regarded prospects and unranked players, which contributed to its overall evaluation.
Among the recruits, notable outcomes include Jeremiah Attaochu, who emerged as an NFL Starter despite being originally ranked 1033, showcasing that lower-ranked players can exceed expectations significantly. However, the class also experienced several misses, particularly among players who were ranked and ultimately failed to perform at a level commensurate with their recruitment status. The presence of players like Louis Young and Isaiah Johnson, who ended up on an undrafted NFL roster, illustrates the challenges faced by recruits from higher rankings.
Overall, the 2010 recruiting class for Georgia Tech met expectations, with a mix of performance outcomes that reflected the original ranking. The S2S rerank did not change, reinforcing the idea that the class delivered on its projected potential. While there were hits like Attaochu, the existence of misses highlighted the variability in performance among ranked recruits. In summary, this class underscores the importance of evaluating recruiting success not just by rankings but by the actual outcomes achieved on the field.