Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Eastern Michigan (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2016 recruiting class for Eastern Michigan presented a mix of outcomes, with several recruits exceeding expectations while others fell short. The class was originally ranked 114th but saw a slight improvement in the S2S rerank to 101. This indicates a degree of positive development among some recruits, particularly those who emerged as starters and contributors despite the overall class rating of 0.
Examining the outcomes, it is clear that Eastern Michigan found success with lower-ranked recruits who became college starters and even earned All-Conference honors. Notably, Jimmy Leatiota and Kevin McGill not only contributed to the team but also received recognition that elevated their profiles within the MAC. This pattern highlights a potential strength in identifying and developing talent that may have been overlooked during the initial recruiting process.
Conversely, several recruits did not meet the expectations set by their original rankings. For instance, Todd Porter, who was ranked 279, only achieved a contributor status, suggesting that he did not fulfill the projections associated with his recruitment. This mix of hits and misses illustrates the challenges and unpredictability inherent in the recruiting process, where outcomes can diverge significantly from initial expectations.
Overall, the 2016 recruiting class for Eastern Michigan met expectations in certain areas while underperforming in others. The increase in the S2S rerank indicates that some players developed well beyond their initial projections, particularly lower-ranked recruits who became key contributors and starters. However, the presence of misses among higher-ranked recruits suggests a need for improvement in evaluating and developing top-tier talent. In summary, while the class had its successes, there remains room for growth in ensuring that all recruits reach their potential.