Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Wyoming (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Wyoming 2013 recruiting class displayed a blend of outcomes, with a significant number of players exceeding their initial recruiting expectations. The class included six recruits who emerged as college starters, showcasing an effective development strategy managed by the coaching staff. Notably, players like J.D. Krill and Jordan Stanton transformed their potential into tangible contributions on the field, indicating a positive trend in player development.
Conversely, the class also featured several higher-ranked recruits who did not reach their anticipated potential. Contributors such as Troy Boyland and Jeff Lark illustrate a disparity between their original rankings and their eventual impact on the team. This mixed bag of results highlights the complexities of college football recruiting, where initial rankings do not always translate into success on the field.
Overall, the class's outcomes suggest an upward trajectory in talent development at Wyoming, particularly for lower-ranked recruits. The ability to cultivate players into starters reflects positively on the program's development capabilities, even as it grapples with the underperformance of some higher-ranked athletes.
The Wyoming 2013 recruiting class met expectations overall, with a notable shift in the S2S rerank indicating improvement in player performance and development. The class's move from a ranking of 124 to 96 reflects an effective evaluation of talent, particularly among lower-ranked recruits who became college starters. In summary, while some ranked recruits did not perform as anticipated, the overall success in developing starters from this class is a positive indicator of the program's growth.