Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- IOL1
- LB1
- OT1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Wisconsin (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2014 recruiting class for Wisconsin demonstrated a mixed bag of outcomes relative to original expectations. While the class was initially ranked 34th, the S2S rerank dropped to 42, indicating that the overall performance did not align with the anticipated success based on recruiting rankings. The blue chip percentage of 21 suggests that a modest portion of the recruits were viewed as elite prospects, which may have affected the overall class performance.
Several players exceeded their recruiting expectations, particularly those who were ranked lower or unranked. Notably, Michael Deiter and Natrell Jamerson emerged as significant contributors at the professional level, showcasing the potential for development within the program. The presence of multiple players achieving All-Conference status further highlights Wisconsin's ability to cultivate talent, even among those who were not initially regarded as elite recruits.
Conversely, the class included a few players who did not meet the expectations set by their rankings, with Jaden Gault being a notable example. Despite a solid number of contributors and impactful players, the overall class performance underscores the variability inherent in recruiting outcomes, where even highly regarded prospects can fall short of expectations.
Overall, the Wisconsin 2014 recruiting class met expectations with a blend of hits that exceeded their original rankings and misses that failed to deliver based on their higher recruiting status. The S2S rerank indicates that while some prospects developed into noteworthy players, the overall talent level may not have aligned with initial projections. This class serves as a reminder of the unpredictability of recruiting outcomes, where development and fit within the program can significantly influence performance.
Takeaway: The Wisconsin 2014 recruiting class featured a strong development story with several standout players, although the overall ranking saw a decline due to underwhelming performances from a few highly ranked recruits.