Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Washington State (2015).
Class Snapshot
Key numbers for this recruiting class
Badges Earned
No class-year badges earned for this class.
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
The 2015 recruiting class for Washington State exhibited a mixed performance in terms of player outcomes versus original recruiting expectations. The class, originally ranked 53rd and subsequently re-ranked to 101st, demonstrated a significant shift in perceived talent level following their collegiate careers. With a total of 24 recruits, the class showcased a zero percent blue chip percentage, indicating that none were considered elite recruits.
Despite the overall disappointing re-ranking, several players emerged as key contributors and starters. A total of seven players exceeded expectations, particularly among those who were originally unranked or lower-ranked. This suggests a potential pattern of effective player development within the program, particularly for those who may have been overlooked during the recruiting process. The outcomes for several of these recruits indicate that Washington State was able to identify and develop talent that may not have been recognized by traditional recruiting metrics.
In contrast, the presence of multiple "Bust" outcomes among higher-ranked recruits points to a significant discrepancy in the expected versus actual performance for some players. The failure of these ranked recruits to meet their expectations reflects a challenge within the recruiting strategy, as these players did not translate their high school success into meaningful contributions at the collegiate level.
Overall, the 2015 recruiting class for Washington State met mixed expectations. While the presence of several players who became college starters indicates some success in player development, the number of recruits labeled as "Bust" suggests that the higher-ranked recruits did not perform to the level anticipated. The S2S re-rank moving down from 53 to 101 reflects this discrepancy, highlighting the need for improved evaluation and recruitment strategies. The key takeaway from this class is the importance of player development, particularly for lower-ranked recruits who can exceed initial expectations.