Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for UTEP (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The UTEP 2014 recruiting class produced a mix of outcomes, with several players stepping into significant roles while others failed to meet initial expectations. The class included 23 total recruits, none of whom were classified as blue-chip prospects, which indicates a reliance on developing talent rather than attracting highly-touted athletes.
Among the outcomes, six players achieved a status of "College Starter," suggesting a moderate level of success in developing talent from within this class. The performance of these starters reflects positively on the coaching staff's ability to utilize lower-ranked recruits effectively, translating their skill sets into viable contributors on the field.
Conversely, the class also included notable underperformers, particularly among the ranked recruits. With only one player ranked within the top 300 achieving a positive outcome, the class faced challenges in fulfilling higher expectations set by initial rankings. The disparity between the original class rank (99) and the S2S rerank (90) suggests a reevaluation of the talent's potential based on their actual performance.
Overall, the UTEP 2014 recruiting class met expectations, particularly in terms of developing several contributors and starters from lower-ranked recruits. However, the class also experienced setbacks with a significant number of underperforming ranked recruits, which limited its overall success. The S2S rerank moving down indicates a recognition of the mixed results from this recruiting cycle. In summary, while the class produced some hits, it ultimately showcased the difficulties of relying solely on lower-ranked recruits and the need for better outcomes from higher-ranked players.