Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- S2
- RB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for USC (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The USC 2013 recruiting class, ranked 5th at the time, featured a strong blue-chip percentage of 100, indicating the presence of only highly regarded recruits. However, the subsequent S2S rerank to 11 suggests that the overall performance did not meet the initial expectations set by the recruiting rankings. This class produced notable outcomes, particularly with two recruits achieving NFL Draft status. Both Su'a Cravens and Leon McQuay III, despite their highly ranked status, managed to become NFL Drafted players, demonstrating that the program successfully developed these talents.
On the other hand, several recruits from this class delivered lower outcomes than anticipated. The majority of players who were originally ranked lower had outcomes classified as "Contributor" or "College Starter," which indicates a level of participation but does not reflect the higher expectations typically associated with their recruiting rankings. The class's combination of high-ranked players who found success alongside those who contributed minimally illustrates a mixed development pattern within the program.
Overall, the 2013 USC recruiting class met expectations for some of its highest-ranked recruits, who successfully transitioned to NFL prospects. However, the class as a whole underperformed as indicated by the drop in S2S ranking. The presence of several contributors and college starters points to a solid but not elite level of development. This class serves as a reminder of the variances in recruiting outcomes, where even highly ranked players can have diverse paths after their initial commitments.