Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for UNLV (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2014 recruiting class for UNLV demonstrated a mixed bag of outcomes, with a total of 19 recruits contributing to the team's future. The overall class ranking of 119, which moved slightly up to 114 in the S2S rerank, suggests that while the recruits were not highly regarded, some managed to provide value. The blue chip percentage of 0 indicates that the class lacked elite talent, which is often a precursor to high-impact performances.
Among the recruits, a notable pattern emerged where several unranked players turned into contributors, highlighting the potential for development beyond initial recruiting assessments. This is particularly relevant for a program like UNLV, which may not consistently attract top-tier talent. The presence of contributors such as Tanuvasa, Nettleton, and Leiva signifies that the coaching staff was able to identify and nurture talent that was overlooked by recruiting services.
Conversely, the class also featured instances of disappointment, particularly among ranked recruits. Players like Decker and Hughes managed to secure college starter roles, but their performances did not significantly exceed the expectations set by their rankings. Additionally, the inclusion of players such as Eldridge, who was labeled a bust, underscores the risk associated with lower-ranked recruits who fail to develop.
Overall, the UNLV 2014 recruiting class met expectations, primarily due to the contributions of unranked players who stepped up as contributors. The slight improvement in the S2S rerank suggests that the program has begun to find value in its recruiting efforts, though still lacks elite talent. The ability to develop unranked recruits into contributors indicates a positive trend for future classes.
In summary, the 2014 class showcased the potential for growth within the program while also highlighting the challenges of recruiting at a non-elite level.