Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT2
- DE1
- IOL1
- LB1
- OT1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for UCLA (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2014 recruiting class for UCLA demonstrated a mixed bag of outcomes relative to their original expectations. With a total of 19 recruits, the class had a blue chip percentage of 53, indicating a significant portion of high-caliber athletes. The S2S rerank improvement from 22 to 10 suggests that the program was able to develop its recruits effectively, yielding notable successes even from players who were not highly regarded at the outset.
The standout performances from players like Jaleel Wadood, Kenny Young, and Kolton Miller underscore a trend of exceeding expectations, particularly among those who were ranked lower at the time of recruitment. Their subsequent success as NFL starters illustrates the program's ability to cultivate talent and maximize potential. Conversely, the presence of players like Adarius Pickett, who became a College Starter but did not surpass expectations, indicates that while the class had high points, not every recruit achieved outcomes significantly beyond their original projections.
Overall, the UCLA 2014 recruiting class met expectations with a mix of strong performers and those who fell short. The class's S2S rerank moving up reflects the development of several recruits into impactful players, especially those who transitioned to the NFL. The presence of multiple hits, particularly regarding NFL starters, showcases the program's success in developing talent. The key takeaway from this class is that while there were strong outcomes, some recruits did not reach the heights anticipated based on their rankings.