Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for UAB (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The UAB 2016 recruiting class, ranked 84th originally, saw a steep drop to 121st in the S2S re-rank. This indicates that the expectations set during the recruiting process were not met in terms of overall player development and contributions on the field. Despite the challenges faced by the program, a few recruits managed to exceed initial expectations, showcasing that even in a class that struggled overall, there were standout performances.
The outcomes of this class reveal a mix of contributions, particularly from unranked recruits who surprised the coaching staff. Players like Andre Wilson and Malique Johnson achieved All Conference honors, showing that the program was able to develop talent beyond conventional rankings. However, the majority of the highly ranked recruits did not materialize as expected, leading to multiple "Bust" outcomes. The disparity between the original ranking and the S2S rerank underscores the difficulty UAB faced in translating recruiting success into performance on the field.
Overall, the UAB 2016 recruiting class underperformed expectations, as indicated by the significant drop in the S2S rerank and the number of recruits labeled as "Bust." The lack of blue-chip recruits and the limited impact from ranked players contributed to this outcome. Despite a few notable hits, the majority of the class did not achieve the expected level of success. The takeaway from this analysis is that while there were bright spots, the overall performance of the class fell short of what was anticipated based on original rankings.