Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
- RB1
- TE1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Texas (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Texas Longhorns' 2014 recruiting class showcased a mix of outcomes that reflect a complex development trajectory. With a class originally ranked 21st and later receiving a S2S rerank of 30, the overall performance suggests a decline in expected impact. The blue chip percentage of 39 indicates that a notable portion of the recruits held high expectations, yet only a few achieved standout results.
The class produced several hits, particularly with players like D'Onta Foreman and Poona Ford, who both rose to NFL Starter statuses despite their original lower rankings. This is indicative of the program's ability to develop talent, even when initial rankings may not have projected significant success. However, the presence of multiple misses, particularly among higher-ranked recruits such as Blake Whiteley and Jermaine Roberts, highlights a failure to convert top prospects into impactful players.
Overall, the Texas Longhorns' 2014 recruiting class underperformed relative to the expectations set by their original rankings. The S2S rerank moving down suggests that the program did not capitalize on the potential of its recruits effectively. While there were notable successes in the form of NFL starters, the class was marred by several busts that ultimately lowered the overall impact of the recruiting efforts. The takeaway from this class is that while some recruits exceeded expectations, a significant number did not contribute at the levels anticipated based on their rankings.