Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- IOL1
- LB1
- TE1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Stanford (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Stanford 2016 recruiting class showcased a mix of outcomes that reflect the program's ongoing commitment to developing talent. With a total of 25 recruits, the class had a blue chip percentage of 32, indicating a focus on attracting higher-caliber athletes. The S2S rerank improved from 28 to 22, suggesting that the overall talent pool had a stronger impact than initially assessed.
In terms of performance, several recruits exceeded expectations, particularly Kaden Smith and Nate Herbig, both of whom emerged as NFL starters. This demonstrates a successful development trajectory for these players, indicating that Stanford's coaching staff effectively harnessed their potential. On the other hand, the class also included recruits like Clark Yarbrough and Bo Peek, who did not meet the expectations set by their rankings, highlighting the variability in recruiting outcomes.
Overall, the class produced a notable number of contributors, with multiple players achieving outcomes classified as College Starter or higher, underscoring the program's ability to develop talent across various positions.
The Stanford 2016 recruiting class met expectations overall, with a solid number of hits and a few notable misses. The S2S rerank improved due to the effective development of key players who surpassed their original rankings, particularly in the NFL pathways for Kaden Smith and Nate Herbig. This illustrates the program's effectiveness in maximizing the potential of its recruits.
In conclusion, the 2016 class reflects a balanced recruiting effort with both successes and areas for improvement, ultimately reaffirming Stanford's position as a competitive program in player development.