Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- RB2
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for South Florida (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The South Florida 2014 recruiting class featured a mix of outcomes, with several recruits significantly exceeding expectations. Notably, the presence of multiple college starters from lower-ranked positions illustrates the program's ability to develop talent effectively. The class included a total of 29 recruits, but only a small percentage (7%) were classified as blue-chip prospects. This lower blue-chip percentage is reflective of the challenges faced in securing top-tier talent, yet the class still managed to produce notable contributors.
In evaluating the overall performance, it's clear that the majority of recruits did not achieve high-level outcomes, as evidenced by the S2S rerank dropping from 38 to 58. This indicates a struggle to translate initial recruiting rankings into performance on the field. While the program did manage to find success stories in players like Quinton Flowers and Ryeshene Bronson, the presence of recruited athletes who fell short of their potential, particularly the higher-ranked players, suggests a developmental gap that needs addressing in future recruiting efforts.
Overall, the South Florida 2014 recruiting class underperformed relative to expectations, as evidenced by the significant drop in the S2S rerank. The class produced several players who became college starters, indicating some success in player development, but the number of recruits who failed to achieve meaningful outcomes was notable. The drop in the overall class rank reflects the challenges the program faced in maximizing the potential of its recruits. In conclusion, while there were some positive outcomes, the class as a whole did not meet the initial expectations set by its recruiting ranking.