Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for South Carolina (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for South Carolina showcased a mixture of outcomes that reflect a significant underperformance relative to initial expectations. With an original class ranking of 19, the expectation was for a strong influx of talent. However, the S2S rerank of 67 indicates that the players did not develop as anticipated.
Despite the overall downturn in rank, several recruits emerged as hits, particularly Pharoh Cooper and David Williams, who both achieved noteworthy NFL statuses. Their successes suggest that while some players exceeded expectations, the overall class struggled to fulfill the potential indicated by their rankings.
The large number of contributors and college starters emerging from this class is a positive takeaway, yet the presence of multiple busts, particularly among higher-ranked players, underscores the challenges faced in player development. The discrepancy between expectations and outcomes highlights areas for improvement in scouting and evaluation processes moving forward.
Overall, the 2013 recruiting class for South Carolina underperformed expectations based on original rankings. While the S2S rerank fell significantly, the presence of several standout players who became hits shows that some individuals did develop well. However, the class's overall performance was dragged down by multiple lower outcomes from ranked recruits.
In summary, the class serves as a reminder that initial rankings do not always correlate with future success, and there is a need for ongoing evaluation of recruitment strategies.