Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2011 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LS1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for SMU (2011).
2011 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2011 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The SMU 2011 recruiting class contained a mix of expectations and outcomes that reveal several developmental patterns within the program. The class was originally ranked 75th, indicating a relatively low expectation for success. Following evaluation, the S2S rerank dropped the class to 108th, suggesting that the recruits did not significantly elevate their standing in terms of performance as expected.
Despite this, the class produced notable contributors. Zach Wood stands out as a Hit, achieving the status of NFL Starter, which highlights that even lower-ranked prospects can sometimes exceed expectations and find success at higher competitive levels. The majority of the recruits, however, fell into the "College Starter" category or lower, indicating a mixed level of development for the class overall.
On the other hand, several ranked recruits, including Maurice Hood, Davon Moreland, and Dontae Levingston, did not perform to the level anticipated from their rankings. Their outcomes reflect a missed opportunity for the program to capitalize on talent that was expected to provide significant contributions. This mix of Hits and Misses showcases the challenges inherent in recruiting, where expectations based on rankings do not always align with actual performance.
Overall, the SMU 2011 recruiting class underperformed expectations. The drop in the S2S rerank from 75 to 108 indicates a failure to meet the original projections based on performance outcomes. While there were a few positive highlights, such as Zach Wood's success, the number of recruits who failed to deliver on their potential was significant, leading to a disappointing assessment of the class.
In summary, the 2011 class exemplifies the unpredictable nature of recruiting, where both high and low-ranked players can either exceed or fall short of expectations.