Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Purdue (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Purdue features a diverse group of 22 players, with a total of 5% identified as blue-chip recruits. The class originally ranked 62nd, which slightly improved to 59th upon reevaluation. This suggests a minor positive adjustment in overall performance relative to recruiting expectations.
A notable trend in this class is the distribution of outcomes among the recruits. Out of the 22 players, a significant proportion achieved outcomes categorized as "College Starter." This indicates a level of program development where lower-ranked recruits were able to contribute at a college level, suggesting effective coaching and player development within the program.
The presence of both hits and misses highlights the dichotomy of expectation versus reality evident in this class. While some recruits such as Myles Norwood exceeded expectations, others like Ra'Zahn Howard, despite being highly ranked, did not meet the anticipated performance levels typical of a player with his recruiting profile.
Overall, the Purdue 2013 recruiting class met expectations, with a balanced mix of contributors and starters relative to their original rankings. The S2S rerank reflects a modest improvement, indicating that while the class did not drastically outpace its initial projections, it successfully developed a number of players into college starters. The takeaway from this class is that while there were some disappointments among higher-ranked recruits, the ability of lower-ranked players to start games underlines a positive trend in talent development within the program.