Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT2
- WR2
- IOL1
- K1
- OT1
- P1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Pittsburgh (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Pittsburgh demonstrated notable development patterns. With a total of 28 recruits and a low blue-chip percentage of 7, the class was not heavily loaded with elite talent. However, the significant rise in the S2S rerank from 47th to 13th indicates that the program was able to maximize the potential of its players. This is particularly apparent in the case of James Conner and Tyler Boyd, who emerged as standout players despite being ranked lower at the start.
The outcomes reflect the program's ability to develop talent effectively, particularly with players who were initially viewed as lower-ranked prospects. Both Conner and Boyd have transitioned into high-level roles, illustrating that Pittsburgh's coaching staff was able to harness their skills and elevate their performance significantly. Conversely, the presence of ranked recruits like TraVon Chapman and Luke Maclean, who did not meet expectations, highlights that even higher-ranked players can fail to translate their potential into on-field success.
Overall, the 2013 recruiting class for Pittsburgh can be seen as having outperformed expectations, particularly given the notable successes of players like Conner and Boyd. The S2S rerank moving up indicates that the coaching staff was effective in developing players, especially those who were not initially highly rated. The class included key contributors who made a difference on the field, while the misses were limited to a few higher-ranked recruits who did not realize their potential. The takeaway from this class is that Pittsburgh managed to cultivate talent well, achieving significant results from a relatively low-ranked recruiting class.