Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- IOL2
- DE1
- LB1
- OT1
- P1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Penn State (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Penn State 2016 recruiting class demonstrated a blend of outcomes that highlight both successful and underwhelming developments within the program. The class received an original ranking of 15 and experienced a slight improvement in the S2S rerank to 13, suggesting some level of growth in player development and overall performance. With a total of 20 recruits and a blue chip percentage of 50, the program was positioned well to capitalize on talent acquisition.
Several recruits outperformed expectations, particularly Miles Sanders and Connor McGovern, both of whom achieved NFL Pro Bowl status despite being ranked 34 and 273, respectively. Their success emphasizes the effectiveness of Penn State's development programs in elevating players beyond their initial rankings. Conversely, the presence of ranked players like Daniel Joseph and Shane Simmons, who only managed to reach the "Contributor" level, indicates that not all expectations were met, particularly for those with higher initial rankings.
Overall, the 2016 recruiting class for Penn State met expectations, with several players surpassing their original projections. The S2S rerank improved, reflecting the program's ability to develop talent effectively. While there were notable successes, some highly-ranked recruits did not achieve expected outcomes, impacting the overall perception of the class. The takeaway from this class is that while there were significant hits, the presence of misses from highly-ranked recruits underscores the variability inherent in recruiting outcomes.