Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DE1
- IOL1
- LB1
- QB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Penn State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Penn State demonstrated a clear trend of development that positively influenced the overall outcomes of the recruits. With an original class rank of 41 and a subsequent S2S rerank to 20, the coaching staff effectively harnessed the potential of their recruits, resulting in a class that outperformed initial expectations. This upward shift indicates that the program was able to develop players effectively, particularly those who were lower-ranked or unranked.
Outcomes across the class varied significantly, with several recruits achieving high success levels. Notably, DaeSean Hamilton, despite being ranked 350, went on to achieve an NFL Drafted status, showcasing the ability of the program to identify and cultivate talent beyond conventional rankings. Conversely, some higher-ranked recruits like Tyler Ferguson did not meet the anticipated outcomes, emphasizing a disparity in the expected versus actual performance that can occur in recruiting.
Overall, the 2013 recruiting class for Penn State outperformed expectations, as indicated by the positive movement in the S2S rerank. The class produced several players who exceeded their recruiting profiles, particularly in the case of DaeSean Hamilton. The presence of both hits and misses illustrates the variability in recruiting success, where some highly touted prospects did not deliver while others thrived. In conclusion, this class serves as a testament to the effectiveness of player development within the Penn State program.