Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oregon State (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 recruiting class for Oregon State exhibited a notable shift in performance from its original ranking to the S2S rerank. Initially ranked 64th, the class improved to a 95th place ranking based on actual performance outcomes. This suggests that the coaching staff effectively developed several players beyond their initial recruiting projections, particularly with a focus on contributions from lower-ranked recruits.
The class produced several hits, particularly in the wide receiver position, where both Timmy Hernandez and Trevon Bradford emerged as college starters. Their ability to perform at this level not only reflects well on their individual development but also indicates a positive trend in the program's capacity to cultivate talent from various recruiting backgrounds. The presence of contributors from lower-ranked recruits (such as Doug Taumoelau and Kenny Turnier) reinforces the notion that Oregon State was able to maximize potential within this class.
Conversely, the class also had its misses, particularly with players like Christian Wallace and Landry Payne. Wallace, despite being a top-300 recruit, did not meet expectations, resulting in a bust label. Payne, while contributing, did not fully capitalize on his status as a top-100 recruit. This mix of outcomes highlights the variability inherent in recruiting and the challenges of predicting future performance based on high school rankings.
Overall, the 2016 recruiting class for Oregon State can be classified as having met expectations. The S2S rerank improved significantly, indicating that many players developed well during their time with the program. While there were some misses among the higher-ranked recruits, the contributions from lower-ranked players balanced the class's overall performance. The key takeaway is that Oregon State demonstrated an ability to develop talent effectively, resulting in a more favorable outcome than initially projected.