Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- DT1
- OT1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oregon State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Oregon State showcased a blend of high-ranked and lower-ranked recruits, with several players significantly exceeding their initial expectations. Notably, three recruits who were originally ranked within the top 50 achieved the outcome of "NFL Starter." This indicates that the coaching staff effectively developed talent, translating high recruit rankings into successful collegiate careers.
On the other hand, two recruits who were also ranked in the upper echelon of the class did not perform up to expectations, resulting in "Bust" outcomes. This discrepancy between ranked recruits' performance emphasizes the unpredictable nature of player development; not all high-projected players translate their potential into success.
Overall, the outcomes indicate that while Oregon State had several standout players from this class, the overall trajectory of development was mixed, especially among the higher-ranked recruits.
This recruiting class met expectations regarding the number of high-performing recruits but underperformed relative to the original class rank, as evidenced by the drop in the S2S rerank from 37 to 49. The presence of multiple "NFL Starter" outcomes among lower-ranked recruits points to effective player development, while the "Bust" outcomes among a couple of higher-ranked players reflect the inherent risks associated with recruiting. In conclusion, the class demonstrated a mix of successful development and unmet potential among its higher-ranked recruits.