Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2007 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- FB1
- IOL1
- LB1
- QB1
- S1
- TE1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oregon (2007).
2007 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2007 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Oregon 2007 recruiting class showcased a mix of outcomes that highlight the program's development patterns. With an original class ranking of 15 and a subsequent S2S rerank of 32, it is evident that the class did not meet its initial expectations. The total of 29 commits and a blue chip percentage of 38 indicates a focus on attracting a balance of higher-rated prospects alongside those who were less heralded.
Analysis of individual outcomes shows that several recruits did exceed expectations, particularly Casey Matthews, who emerged as an NFL Starter despite being originally ranked 307. This reflects the program’s ability to develop talent effectively, particularly in positions that require strong coaching and player development. Conversely, the presence of multiple players labeled as Busts, particularly those with original rankings under 300, suggests that not all recruits fulfilled their projected potential.
The overall distribution of outcomes illustrates a program that can identify and nurture talent, but also highlights challenges in consistently translating recruiting rankings into successful collegiate careers. The combination of Hits and Misses suggests that while the program has had success, it also faced significant shortfalls among its higher-ranked players.
Overall, the Oregon 2007 recruiting class underperformed expectations based on its original ranking. The drop in S2S rerank from 15 to 32 indicates a clear disconnect between initial projections and actual performance outcomes. With a significant number of recruits achieving low outcomes, particularly among those who were ranked, the class's overall effectiveness was diminished. The key takeaway from this evaluation is that while Oregon had some notable successes, the majority of the class did not yield the expected returns on investment in talent.