Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB3
- DE2
- IOL1
- LB1
- OT1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Ole Miss (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2014 recruiting class for Ole Miss had a mix of outcomes, with several players achieving notable successes while others fell short of initial expectations. The class was originally ranked 10th, indicating a strong influx of talent. However, the S2S rerank of 14 suggests that the overall performance of this class did not fully align with the high recruiting expectations set at the time.
A key trend observed in this class was the presence of several recruits who were drafted into the NFL, indicating that while some players did not meet the expectations associated with their rankings, they still managed to reach a level of success in their careers. Despite having a solid blue chip percentage of 36%, the class produced a mix of contributors and starters, with a few standout players earning All Conference accolades.
Conversely, some of the highest-ranked recruits did not perform up to the level anticipated. Akeem Judd, originally ranked 24th, only reached the level of a college starter, which can be viewed as underwhelming given the expectations of a top-25 recruit. Similarly, Marquis Haynes and Fahn Cooper were drafted but did not achieve the elite status often expected of their respective rankings.
Overall, the 2014 recruiting class for Ole Miss met mixed expectations. While the class included several players who achieved noteworthy outcomes, such as being drafted into the NFL, the S2S rerank indicates a decline in perceived talent relative to initial expectations. The high number of contributors and starters suggests that the class had a foundational impact, but the presence of several misses indicates that not all recruits delivered on their potential. In summary, while there were notable hits, the overall performance of the class suggests a need for improvement in aligning recruitment strategies with player development.