Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- WR3
- CB2
- DE1
- DT1
- OT1
- RB1
- TE1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Ole Miss (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Ole Miss was marked by a mix of standout performances and notable disappointments. The class was originally ranked 11th, signaling a strong focus on talent acquisition, and featured several high-profile recruits. The S2S rerank of 14 indicates a slight decline in perceived value as their careers progressed, suggesting that while some players thrived, others did not reach their potential.
The standout performers, such as Laremy Tunsil and Evan Engram, illustrate the program's ability to develop talent, even from lower-ranked recruits. Tunsil, originally ranked 4th, and Engram, a late addition ranked 850, achieved NFL Pro Bowl status, showcasing the program's effectiveness in maximizing player potential. Furthermore, Laquon Treadwell also emerged as an NFL starter, reinforcing the notion that Ole Miss successfully cultivated talent from its recruiting efforts.
Conversely, the presence of multiple "Bust" outcomes among highly ranked recruits reflects challenges in development and performance consistency. With players like Nickolas Brassell and Quadarias Mireles failing to meet their expectations, the class illustrates that success in recruiting does not always guarantee on-field performance. Overall, while the class had notable hits, the number of misses among ranked recruits contributed to a mixed outcome.
Overall, the Ole Miss 2013 recruiting class met expectations in terms of standout performers but underperformed when considering the number of highly-ranked players who did not contribute significantly. The S2S rerank of 14 suggests that while the program secured some high-caliber talent, the overall effectiveness in developing those highly ranked recruits was inconsistent. The takeaway from this class is that while there were notable successes, the presence of several high-profile misses indicates room for improvement in player development.