Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB2
- DE1
- S1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Oklahoma (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Oklahoma demonstrated a mix of outcomes that reflect both strong development and underperformance relative to initial expectations. With a total of 25 recruits and a blue-chip percentage of 32, the class was considered solid, yet the S2S rerank moved down to 35, indicating a collective underperformance compared to the original class ranking of 16.
Analyzing the outcomes, the class produced notable hits, particularly in Ogbonnia Okoronkwo and Jordan Evans, both of whom transitioned from low rankings to becoming NFL starters. Their success illustrates that Oklahoma's program was effective in developing talent that may have been overlooked during the recruiting process. However, the class also experienced significant misses, particularly with highly-ranked recruits like Keith Ford and Josiah St. John, who did not meet the expectations associated with their original rankings.
This dichotomy highlights an important trend in recruiting: while rankings can provide insight into potential, they do not always guarantee success. Oklahoma's ability to develop lower-ranked players into impactful contributors and starters emphasizes the importance of coaching and player development in maximizing talent.
Overall, the Oklahoma 2013 recruiting class met some expectations while underperforming in others. The presence of successful outcomes from lower-ranked recruits contributed positively, but the significant misses from higher-ranked players detracted from the overall performance of the class. The S2S rerank reflects this mixed outcome, showing a decline from the original class ranking due to the lack of upper-tier talent development. The takeaway from this class is that while recruiting rankings are significant, program development plays a critical role in realizing a recruit's potential.