Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Ohio (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2016 recruiting class for Ohio exhibited a mix of underwhelming outcomes and notable successes. With a total of 26 recruits, the class was originally ranked 63rd but fell to a S2S rerank of 115. This shift indicates a significant underperformance relative to initial expectations, particularly given the low blue chip percentage of 4.
Despite the challenges, several players emerged as hits, particularly those who exceeded their recruiting profiles. Notable among these were Austin Conrad and Dylan Conner, both of whom earned All Conference honors, showcasing their development and contributions to the program. Additionally, players such as Cameron Odom and Nick Sink transitioned into college starters, demonstrating that the class was capable of producing effective contributors despite the overall rankings.
Overall, the Ohio 2016 recruiting class underperformed expectations, as reflected in the downward movement in the S2S rerank. While several players achieved significant accolades and starting roles, the majority of the class did not meet the initial projections based on their rankings. The rise of a few individuals indicates that there were pockets of success, but the overall outcome shows a class that did not fulfill its potential.
In summary, while there were notable hits within the class, the overall results indicate that expectations were not met, leading to a disappointing outcome for Ohio's 2016 recruiting efforts.