Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Ohio (2010).
2010 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2010 recruiting class for Ohio presented a complex picture of development and performance. With a class ranking of 118 and a slight improvement to 114 in the S2S rerank, the outcomes reflect a mixture of both expected underperformance and solid contributions. Notably, the class included zero blue-chip recruits, indicating a reliance on lower-ranked players to fill roster needs.
Ohio's outcomes manifested in a number of contributors and starters, notably with Nathan Carpenter achieving the status of College Starter. However, the presence of several Bust outcomes among ranked recruits like Jamaal Tarrent and Mark Smith suggests that while the class produced some positive results, it did so with significant shortcomings in terms of higher-ranked players meeting their potential. This pattern indicates a need for enhanced evaluation processes in future recruiting cycles.
Overall, the Ohio 2010 recruiting class underperformed against expectations, particularly considering the number of ranked recruits who did not fulfill their projected roles. The S2S rerank remained relatively flat, reflecting a lack of significant development among the higher-ranked players. The takeaway from this class is a clear need for improved recruitment strategies to better align player potential with performance outcomes.