Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- OT1
- P1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for New Mexico (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The New Mexico 2016 recruiting class exhibited a mix of outcomes that reflected both hits and misses, highlighting a program that has the potential to develop talent but also faces challenges in maximizing the contributions of higher-ranked recruits. The presence of several unranked recruits achieving higher outcomes, such as All Conference and College Starter designations, indicates effective player development at the program level. This suggests a focus on coaching and scheme that can enhance player performance regardless of initial rankings.
In contrast, the two notable misses from the class, Teton Saltes and Stanley Barnwell, exemplify situations where recruits ranked fairly high did not fulfill a higher potential impact on the team. While Saltes was drafted into the NFL, his performance did not align with the expectations typically associated with a top-800 recruit. Barnwell, while a College Starter, did not capitalize on his higher ranking, suggesting opportunities for improvement in evaluating talent that can transition smoothly into impactful college careers.
Overall, the 2016 class showcased the program's ability to cultivate talent from various starting points, but also highlighted a need for better alignment between expectations and outcomes for higher-ranked players.
This recruiting class for New Mexico largely met expectations, with several recruits achieving outcomes that aligned with or exceeded their original rankings. The S2S rerank improved from 92 to 62, indicating a recognition of the potential and performance of players within this class. However, the presence of misses among higher-ranked recruits suggests that while the program can develop talent, there is room for improvement in maximizing the contributions of all recruits.
In conclusion, the New Mexico 2016 recruiting class reflects a balanced outcome with both hits and misses, underscoring the program's potential for development and the need for ongoing assessment of recruitment strategies.