Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- QB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Navy (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2015 recruiting class for Navy displayed a mix of outcomes, with a notable number of contributors emerging from lower-ranked recruits. The class contained a total of 20 commits, with no blue-chip prospects, reflecting the challenges faced in attracting higher-rated talent. The original class rank of 108 and a slight drop in the S2S rerank to 114 suggest that the overall expectations were not fully met, as the class did not significantly outperform its initial ranking.
The contributors identified, such as Tazh Maloy, Jackson Mitchell, and Kendel Wright, highlight a positive aspect of the program's player development, as they managed to exceed expectations despite being lower-ranked recruits. However, the presence of busts among higher-ranked recruits, such as Niko Yaramus and Rahn Bailey, indicates that not all prospects lived up to their rankings. This pattern illustrates a common trend in recruiting classes where lower-ranked players can outperform their initial projections, while higher-ranked recruits may fail to deliver.
Overall, the 2015 recruiting class for Navy underperformed against expectations. While there were some positive contributions from lower-ranked players, the lack of high-impact performers and the number of busts among ranked recruits contributed to a disappointing outcome relative to the original class ranking. The S2S rerank reflects this reality, showing a decline in the projected value of the class. In summary, the class showcased the potential for development but ultimately fell short of delivering on its recruiting promise.