Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Navy (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2013 recruiting class for Navy consisted of 21 players, with a total class rank of 112 and a slight improvement in the S2S rerank to 106. The class had no blue-chip recruits, and the overall class rating was 78.25, indicating a focus on finding value in overlooked prospects. The outcomes for many recruits suggest a successful development strategy, particularly for those who were originally ranked lower.
A notable aspect of this class is the contribution from several recruits who were originally ranked significantly lower. Sean Spencer, Jamir Tillman, Dishan Romine, and Patrick Hoffman all emerged as college starters, showcasing the program's ability to cultivate talent from less heralded backgrounds. This trend reflects a consistent pattern where Navy has effectively identified and developed players who may not have garnered high rankings but possess the potential to contribute significantly on the field.
Conversely, the class also included a couple of misses where ranked recruits did not fulfill expectations. Austin Kurke and Maurice Morris, both originally ranked in the mid-2000s, were unable to make an impact, resulting in their classification as busts. This highlights the inherent risk in recruiting, where even moderately ranked prospects can underperform relative to their projected potential.
Overall, the Navy 2013 recruiting class met expectations, particularly through the performance of its lower-ranked recruits who became college starters. The S2S rerank moved up slightly due to the contributions from these players, indicating successful development and utilization of talent. While there were a few misses among the higher-ranked recruits, the strong performance of the hits balanced the overall outcome. In summary, this class demonstrates the effectiveness of Navy's recruitment strategy, emphasizing development over initial rankings.