Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Mississippi State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Mississippi State featured a mix of outcomes, with several players proving to be valuable contributors despite their varied rankings. The class initially ranked 25th but saw a significant drop to 74th in the S2S re-rank. This indicates a clear underperformance relative to expectations, especially considering the notable number of players who achieved outcomes classified as "College Starter" or lower.
The class included a significant proportion of players who were originally ranked lower, such as Fred Ross, who emerged as an "All Conference" talent despite being rated 226th. This reflects a positive development trend within the program, showcasing the ability to cultivate talent beyond initial expectations. However, the presence of notable misses, particularly among higher-ranked recruits, illustrates challenges in fulfilling the projected potential associated with those players.
In summary, the 2013 recruiting class for Mississippi State underperformed relative to its original expectations. The drop from an initial ranking of 25 to a re-rank of 74 highlights the disparity between projected and actual outcomes. While the class produced some hits, particularly with Fred Ross, the overall trend was marred by several high-ranking players who failed to deliver. The key takeaway is that while the class had its successes, the overall results did not align with the expectations set during the recruiting process.