Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- DE1
- IOL1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Middle Tennessee State (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
Middle Tennessee State's 2015 recruiting class demonstrated a noteworthy level of development, particularly in terms of exceeding expectations from lower-ranked recruits. With a total of 24 recruits, the class was diverse in talent, yet the blue-chip percentage stood at 0, indicating that none were classified as elite prospects. The S2S rerank moving up to 51 from an original ranking of 86 suggests that the program effectively developed the talent it brought in, particularly among players who were under the radar.
The outcome distribution reveals a mix of performance levels, with several recruits achieving higher outcomes than their initial rankings indicated. Notably, players like Chandler Brewer and Jeremy Cutrer showcased their ability to thrive at the collegiate level, achieving outcomes that reflect their potential and hard work. This trend highlights Middle Tennessee State's capacity to cultivate talent in a competitive recruiting landscape, even without elite blue-chip prospects.
The 2015 recruiting class for Middle Tennessee State ultimately outperformed expectations, especially given the lack of high-ranked blue-chip players. The S2S rerank's improvement reflects the program's successful development strategies for its recruits. The presence of multiple contributors and a couple of standout performances indicates a solid foundation for future growth. Overall, this class illustrates that effective player development can lead to positive results, regardless of initial recruiting rankings.