Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
- OT1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Middle Tennessee State (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
Middle Tennessee State's 2014 recruiting class displayed a mix of outcomes, with a notable number of players exceeding expectations in terms of performance. The class was originally ranked 101, but the re-ranking to 65 indicates a positive shift in the assessment of player contributions. With a total of 23 recruits, the class featured no blue-chip prospects, which often makes success more challenging. However, the presence of multiple players who became college starters reflects effective talent development within the program.
The outcomes for several recruits show that even those with lower rankings can become significant contributors. Notably, both Carlos Johnson and D.J. Sanders emerged as college starters despite being ranked lower than 1000, highlighting the coaching staff's ability to develop players who may have been overlooked during the recruiting process. On the other hand, the presence of two ranked recruits, David Adams and J'vonte Herrod, who did not meet expectations serves as a reminder of the inherent unpredictability in college football recruiting.
Overall, Middle Tennessee State's 2014 recruiting class met expectations by producing several contributors and starters, despite the absence of highly ranked recruits. The S2S re-rank improved due to the emergence of players as reliable starters, indicating effective player development. The takeaway from this analysis is that while the class had a low original ranking, the outcomes demonstrate that developmental potential can be realized even without blue-chip talent.