Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Middle Tennessee State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The 2013 recruiting class for Middle Tennessee State demonstrated a noteworthy trend in player development, especially among lower-ranked recruits. With a total of 24 commits and no blue-chip prospects, the program successfully transformed 11 recruits into college starters, highlighting effective recruitment strategies and coaching. The ability to develop talent from lower ranks is a positive indicator for the program's future, suggesting that their developmental processes are yielding results.
In contrast, the class had four ranked recruits who did not meet expectations and were categorized as contributors. Although these recruits had initial higher projections, their inability to ascend to starter roles indicates a gap between recruitment expectations and actual performance on the field. This contrast emphasizes the importance of not only recruiting but also developing players effectively to maximize their potential.
Overall, the outcomes from this class reveal a strong performance, particularly in the ability to turn lower-ranked recruits into significant contributors. The positive development trajectory of these players suggests that Middle Tennessee State can continue to build a competitive program through focused development efforts.
The 2013 recruiting class for Middle Tennessee State significantly outperformed expectations, as evidenced by the high number of college starters compared to the team's original ranking. The S2S rerank improved from 101 to 93, reflecting the strong outcomes achieved by players who were initially viewed as lower-tier prospects. This class serves as a compelling example of how effective coaching and player development can lead to success, even without blue-chip talent.
Takeaway: Middle Tennessee State's 2013 recruiting class exemplifies the program's potential to develop talent from lower rankings into impactful college players.