Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DE1
- LB1
- RB1
- S1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Michigan State (2010).
2010 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2010 recruiting class for Michigan State, originally ranked 32nd, experienced a notable surge in its S2S rerank to 3, which highlights a substantial improvement in player development and program effectiveness. This class featured a total of 22 recruits, with a blue chip percentage of 23%, indicating a modest number of highly-rated prospects. The evaluation of individual player outcomes reveals that Michigan State successfully developed several players beyond their initial recruiting expectations.
Key outcomes include Le'Veon Bell, who, despite being ranked 1526, achieved an impressive NFL Pro Bowl designation, showcasing the program's ability to nurture talent from lower-ranked positions. Additionally, multiple players, such as William Gholston, Tony Lippett, and Darqueze Dennard, all recorded high outcomes as NFL starters, further reflecting the program's focus on player development. However, the class also had its share of disappointments, most notably with Joe Boisture, a higher-ranked recruit who did not fulfill expectations, resulting in a "Bust" label.
Overall, the Michigan State 2010 recruiting class outperformed expectations significantly. The S2S rerank moved up dramatically from the original class rank due to the successful development of lower-ranked recruits into impactful players, alongside several contributions from mid-ranked players. In summary, the 2010 class exemplifies effective recruiting and player development strategies that led to positive outcomes.