Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DE2
- TE2
- DL1
- QB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Miami (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Miami Hurricanes' 2014 recruiting class featured a blend of expectations and outcomes that illustrate a mixed development trajectory. The original ranking of 13 indicated a moderately strong class, while the S2S rerank to 15 suggests a slight decline in perceived talent. Miami secured 27 total recruits, with a blue chip percentage of 37, indicating they brought in a good number of highly regarded prospects, but the actual performance varied considerably among individuals.
Among the notable outcomes, players like David Njoku and Chad Thomas emerged as hits, showcasing their ability to exceed the recruiting expectations placed upon them. Njoku, despite being originally ranked 818, achieved the remarkable status of NFL Pro Bowl, while Thomas transitioned into an NFL Starter after college. Conversely, some ranked recruits, such as Joseph Yearby and Brad Kaaya, faced challenges in aligning their outcomes with their original rankings. Yearby was recognized as All Conference but fell short of the highest expectations, while Kaaya was NFL Drafted, indicating a solid career, yet he could not be classified as a standout within his recruiting tier.
Overall, the 2014 recruiting class for Miami met mixed expectations. While the presence of high-achieving players like Njoku and Thomas suggests some success, the S2S rerank moving down from 13 to 15 indicates there were significant challenges in maximizing the potential of several highly-ranked recruits. The class's overall performance reflects a combination of solid contributors and underwhelming outcomes among some expected standouts.
In conclusion, while the class included noteworthy hits, the mixed outcomes highlight areas for improvement in future recruiting cycles.