Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DE2
- LB1
- S1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Miami (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Miami demonstrated a mix of outcomes that highlight the program's ability to develop talent, particularly among players with lower original rankings. Notably, the class included three recruits who emerged as NFL starters, which is a strong indicator of effective player development and program impact. This success is reflected in the significant rise in the S2S rerank from 18 to 7, suggesting that the coaching staff was able to cultivate potential beyond what the initial rankings suggested.
Conversely, the class also featured some notable misses among higher-ranked recruits. Both Derrick Griffin and Kevin Olsen were expected to contribute significantly based on their rankings but ultimately did not meet those expectations. This contrast between the hits and misses indicates that while Miami successfully developed certain players, there were also instances where higher expectations were not fulfilled.
Overall, the Miami 2013 recruiting class outperformed expectations, particularly in the context of player development and the transition to the professional level for several recruits. The S2S rerank improved significantly due to the successful development of players like Gus Edwards, Al-Quadin Muhammad, and Artie Burns, who all became NFL starters. This class showcases the potential for unranked or lower-ranked recruits to exceed their original projections, while also highlighting the risks associated with higher-ranked prospects that underperform.
Takeaway: Miami's 2013 recruiting class exemplifies a successful blend of development, yielding strong NFL outcomes despite some notable misses among higher-ranked recruits.