Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- IOL1
- LB1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Memphis (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 recruiting class for Memphis showcased a mix of performance outcomes that reflect the program's developmental trajectory. With an original class rank of 66 and a substantial improvement to a S2S rerank of 19, the coaching staff demonstrated an ability to cultivate talent effectively. The increase in ranking suggests that several recruits developed beyond their initial expectations, contributing positively to the team's depth and performance.
In total, the class consisted of 24 recruits, with a modest blue chip percentage of 4%. This indicates that the majority of the talent was not of elite caliber, yet several players emerged as contributors and starters. Notably, the presence of multiple players achieving “College Starter” and “All Conference” labels reflects the program's capacity to nurture talent, even when initial recruiting rankings were not high.
Overall, the Memphis 2016 recruiting class met expectations, as evidenced by the significant number of players who became contributors and college starters. The S2S rerank suggests that the evaluation of this class improved as players developed within the program, indicating effective coaching and player development practices. The takeaway from this class is that Memphis was able to maximize the potential of its recruits, turning a lower-ranked class into a productive group that made meaningful contributions on the field.