Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Memphis (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2014 recruiting class for Memphis displayed a mix of outcomes that reflect the program's potential for player development. The class ranked 77th originally, but saw its S2S ranking drop to 104, indicating a decline in perceived talent relative to peers. However, several recruits emerged as college starters, particularly those who were unranked or lower-ranked, revealing a trend of successful development among less heralded prospects.
Among the hits, Curtis Akins and Ernest Suttles both transitioned from their respective rankings to become reliable starters. Similarly, Jace Neville's rise from a lower rank to a starter illustrates the program's capability to enhance player performance significantly. On the other hand, several highly-ranked recruits such as Chris Matthews and Thomas Brown did not fulfill their potential, resulting in bust outcomes that contributed to the class's overall disappointing score.
The overall pattern suggests that while Memphis was able to cultivate talent from lower-ranked recruits, the class as a whole did not meet expectations, particularly in terms of higher-ranked prospects failing to develop into impactful contributors.
The Memphis 2014 recruiting class underperformed expectations, as evidenced by the significant number of recruits classified as busts. The S2S rerank dropped, reflecting a decreased assessment of the talent pool's impact. This disparity highlights challenges in developing higher-ranked recruits while also showcasing the ability to cultivate talent from the lower echelons. In conclusion, the class's outcome primarily illustrates the program's inconsistency in harnessing the potential of its higher-ranked prospects.