Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DE1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Memphis (2010).
2010 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2010 recruiting class for Memphis produced a mix of outcomes that reflect both promising developments and notable underperformances. With a total of 37 recruits, the class was not heavily weighted in blue-chip talent, recording a mere 3% in blue chip percentage. This statistic suggests that the majority of the recruits were either lower-ranked or unranked. However, among the recruited players, there were instances of exceeding expectations, as evidenced by Johnnie Farms achieving an All Conference status.
The overall outcomes for the class reveal a trend of moderate success, particularly in the context of the original class rank of 70 and a slight improvement in the S2S rerank to 69. This stability in ranking indicates that while the class did not drastically underperform, it also did not significantly rise above initial expectations. Notably, several players reached the College Starter level, contributing positively to the team, which aligns with the overall impression of a program still in the development phase.
Overall, the Memphis 2010 recruiting class met expectations, as indicated by the distribution of outcomes among the recruits. The S2S rerank remained relatively flat, suggesting that while some players succeeded, the overall impact reflected the class's composition and the challenges inherent in recruiting lower-ranked talent. The class produced a balanced array of contributors but also faced setbacks with underperforming ranked recruits. In summary, Memphis's 2010 recruiting class illustrates a program developing its talent pool while also grappling with the limitations of its recruiting strategy.