Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB2
- CB1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Marshall (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 recruiting class for Marshall displayed a mix of outcomes, with some players significantly outperforming their original rankings while others fell short. The class had a total of 33 recruits, with a blue chip percentage of 6%, suggesting that the majority of the recruits were not considered elite prospects. The S2S rerank of 69 indicates a slight decline in perceived talent after evaluations of performance began to take shape.
The standout performers from this class were the offensive linemen Alex Mollette and Alex Salguero, both of whom achieved All Conference status and significantly exceeded their recruitment expectations. Their success underscores a positive trend in the development of players within the program, particularly in the offensive line. Conversely, highly-ranked recruits such as Jacob McCrary and Terry Richardson underperformed relative to their expectations, indicating that not all evaluations translate into on-field success.
Overall, while some players reached commendable heights, the overall class reflects a program that is continuing to develop talent but still faces challenges with its higher-ranked recruits.
The Marshall 2016 recruiting class largely met expectations, although it also highlighted specific areas for improvement. The S2S rerank dropped slightly, suggesting that the anticipated impact of the class did not fully materialize, particularly with the higher-ranked recruits who did not perform as expected. The presence of multiple contributors and All Conference selections indicates a solid foundation for talent development moving forward. However, the number of busts among ranked recruits serves as a reminder that recruiting is not an exact science and that expectations must be managed carefully.
Takeaway: The 2016 recruiting class for Marshall showcased both promising talent and disappointing outcomes, reflecting a mixed but generally positive trajectory for player development.