Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DE1
- DT1
- IOL1
- LB1
- TE1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for LSU (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 LSU recruiting class was initially lauded with a top ranking, reflecting high expectations for the talent brought into the program. However, the S2S rerank fell significantly to 10, indicating a substantial drop in perceived performance relative to those expectations. This suggests that while LSU did manage to sign a number of highly regarded prospects, the overall development of these players did not align with their projected trajectories.
Notably, the class produced several players who became hits, particularly in the defensive positions. Players like Devin White and Kristian Fulton not only met but exceeded their expected outcomes, showcasing the ability of the program to develop talent effectively in certain positions. However, this was contrasted by the presence of misses, such as Lindsey Scott and Willie Allen, who failed to deliver on their rankings. Such outcomes highlight the variability in player development and performance, a common theme in the world of college football recruiting.
Overall, the LSU 2016 recruiting class met mixed expectations, with some standout performances overshadowed by underwhelming outcomes from other recruits. The significant drop in S2S rerank reflects the challenges faced in fully realizing the potential of all recruits, even within a top-ranked class. This class illustrates the unpredictable nature of recruiting, where high expectations do not always guarantee success on the field.
Takeaway: LSU's 2016 recruiting class demonstrated potential with several standout players, but ultimately underperformed relative to initial expectations.