Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DE1
- DT1
- LS1
- QB1
- RB1
- TE1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for LSU (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The LSU 2015 recruiting class, ranked 10th originally, saw a slight decline in performance as reflected in the S2S rerank of 12. The class brought in a total of 26 recruits, with a 60% blue chip percentage indicating a strong influx of talent. However, the outcomes reveal a mixed bag of performances.
Several recruits exceeded their expectations, notably Arden Key and Derrick Dillon, who both made significant contributions at the collegiate level and beyond. Conversely, a couple of the higher-ranked recruits, such as David Ducre and Tyron Johnson, did not perform at the level anticipated from their original rankings, leading to an overall underwhelming outcome for those specific players. The presence of contributors rather than stars from the highest-ranked recruits illustrates a gap between initial projections and actual performance.
Overall, the 2015 recruiting class for LSU underperformed expectations, particularly when considering the high original ranking. The S2S rerank reflects this trend, as the class did not yield the level of high-impact players projected at the time of recruitment. While there were notable hits, the number of contributors and misses from higher-ranked recruits indicates a need for improvement in future recruiting efforts. The key takeaway is that while the class included some successes, many recruits did not fulfill the expectations set by their rankings.