Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Louisiana Tech (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 recruiting class for Louisiana Tech demonstrated a mix of outcomes, with some players exceeding expectations while others did not meet their projected potential. The class originally ranked 99th but moved up to 74th in the S2S rerank, indicating some level of positive development within the overall team performance.
Key players like Adrian Hardy and Kody Russey emerged as significant contributors, each earning "All Conference" honors, which suggests that scouting and coaching played a vital role in their development. The absence of blue-chip recruits in this class indicates that Louisiana Tech relied on developing lower-ranked players effectively, which is an encouraging trend for their recruiting strategy.
On the other hand, several recruits, including Kennedy Madison and Jack Abraham, did not perform to the levels expected based on their rankings. This discrepancy highlights the inherent risks in recruiting, particularly for programs that do not land high-profile athletes. Overall, the outcomes suggest that while the class had its share of successes, the number of players who underperformed relative to their recruiting rankings could indicate areas for future improvement in talent evaluation.
The Louisiana Tech 2016 recruiting class met expectations overall, as evidenced by the number of contributors and college starters produced. The S2S rerank improved, reflecting the development of some players beyond their initial projections. However, the presence of a few busts among ranked recruits indicates that there is still room for improvement in identifying and developing talent. In summary, this class showed potential but also revealed challenges that the program must address moving forward.