Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Kent State (2010).
2010 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2010 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2010 recruiting class for Kent State displayed a notable trend of exceeding expectations, particularly among lower-ranked recruits. The class, which was originally ranked 103, saw a significant improvement in its S2S rerank to 85, indicating that the program was able to develop talent effectively despite a lack of high-profile recruits. The blue chip percentage stood at 0, which further emphasizes that the success of this class was not reliant on elite talent but rather on the coaching and development provided to the recruits.
A total of five recruits emerged as hits, demonstrating a strong ability to cultivate players who were not highly regarded in the recruiting rankings. This included players like Roosevelt Nix-Jones, who reached the NFL Pro Bowl, and several others who became college starters or earned all-conference honors. Conversely, the class also included misses, such as Thomas Pizzurro and Jerome Davis, who underperformed relative to their initial rankings. This mix illustrates the varied outcomes of the 2010 class, showcasing both successful developments and disappointing results.
Overall, the Kent State 2010 recruiting class outperformed expectations given its original ranking. The S2S rerank moving up indicates a successful development process that allowed many low-ranked recruits to flourish beyond their initial projections. The presence of multiple hits demonstrates the program's capability to identify and nurture talent effectively, while the misses highlight that even within a successful class, not all recruits live up to their potential. In conclusion, this class can be considered a solid success for Kent State, particularly in maximizing the development of lower-ranked talent.