Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DL1
- QB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Kansas State (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2016 recruiting class for Kansas State showcased a mix of outcomes that reflect the potential inconsistencies in recruitment and player development. With an original class rank of 50, the class was projected to have modest contributions, which is in line with the S2S rerank of 45. The blue chip percentage of 10 indicates that only a small fraction of the recruits were considered elite prospects, which contributed to the overall performance of the class.
The outcomes reveal a blend of contributors and starters, with several players achieving recognition such as All Conference honors. Notably, recruits like Nick Lenners and Abdul Beecham became College Starters, meeting and exceeding expectations for lower-ranked players. Meanwhile, higher-ranked recruits like Byron Pringle and A.J. Parker demonstrated that they could fulfill their potential, with Pringle notably becoming an NFL Starter.
Overall, the Kansas State 2016 recruiting class met expectations, with several players contributing positively to the team. The S2S rerank moving slightly upward suggests an acknowledgment of the recruits’ performance relative to their original projections. The presence of both hits and a notable miss indicates that while some players significantly outperformed their rankings, others did not reach the anticipated heights.
In conclusion, this class illustrates the nuanced nature of recruiting, where both high and low-ranked players can yield valuable contributions, reinforcing the importance of development within the program.