Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DE1
- K1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Kansas State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Kansas State demonstrated a mixed outcome relative to the original expectations set during the recruiting process. The class was originally ranked 60th, and the S2S rerank of 65 indicates a slight decline in perceived value based on the players' performances. The low blue-chip percentage of 5% suggests that the class did not heavily feature top-tier talent, which often correlates with higher success rates.
Among the 20 total recruits, there was a notable presence of contributors and college starters, with 8 players achieving at least a college starter status. However, the presence of multiple players labeled as Busts, including highly ranked recruits like Devon Nash, indicates that some prospects did not meet the expectations associated with their rankings. This pattern of underperformance among ranked players is significant and highlights the risks involved in recruiting, particularly for players who are expected to be impactful.
The overall outcomes show a tendency for lower-ranked prospects to exceed expectations, as seen with Jordan Willis' transition to an NFL Starter. This contrasts sharply with the performance of several highly ranked recruits, who ultimately did not deliver on their projected potential. The combination of both hits and misses illustrates the variability of recruiting classes and the importance of not solely relying on rankings when evaluating player potential.
Overall, the Kansas State 2013 recruiting class met expectations for its lower-tier recruits, but underperformed among its higher-ranked prospects. The S2S rerank shifted down due to the significant number of ranked players who failed to achieve outcomes beyond a Bust designation. The class serves as a reminder that while recruiting rankings provide a guideline, the actual performance can vary widely, impacting the overall assessment of a recruiting class.