Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DE1
- QB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for James Madison (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2015 recruiting class for James Madison showcased a mix of outcomes, with notable successes and disappointments. The class had no blue-chip prospects and was ranked 121st nationally, indicating a low level of recruiting expectations. Despite this, the class managed to produce one standout player, Dimitri Holloway, who earned All American honors, demonstrating that the program can develop talent effectively even from unranked or lower-ranked recruits.
Outcomes varied significantly among the other recruits. Trai Sharp, while a college starter, did not exceed the expectations tied to his ranking, suggesting that while he was a reliable contributor, he did not reach the level anticipated from his top-1000 ranking. Conversely, Jordan Brooks, who was ranked even higher, fell short of expectations entirely, resulting in a "Bust" label that reflects a lack of impact relative to his recruitment status.
Overall, the class illustrated the challenges of recruiting, particularly when lacking blue-chip talent, but also highlighted the program's ability to develop players like Holloway despite initial expectations.
The 2015 recruiting class for James Madison met some expectations but also exhibited notable underperformance in certain areas. The S2S rerank showed a slight improvement, moving from 121 to 112, indicating that while the program saw some success in player development, the overall class did not significantly rise in stature. The presence of a standout like Holloway balanced the outcomes, but the mixed results from other recruits, particularly the busts, suggest a nuanced evaluation of this class.
Takeaway: The 2015 class yielded a mixture of outcomes, with a standout performance from Holloway overshadowing the disappointments from several ranked recruits.